ZachXBT’s New Crypto Support Site To Block UK, India, Canada | News

Currencies38693
Market Cap$ 2.71T-1.26%
24h Spot Volume$ 60.43B-14.4%
DominanceBTC56.96%-0.27%ETH10.72%-1.64%
ETH Gas0.08 Gwei
News
Aug 22, 2026
2min read
byRizwan Ansari
forCoinpedia

<img src="https://xpertsstudio.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/ZachXBT-Names-Teen-Behind-19-Million-<a href="https://xpertsstudio.com/south-korea-advances-<a href="https://xpertsstudio.com/official-trump-crypto-surges-to-2-73-but-rsi-85-signals-overheating/” title=”Official Trump crypto surges to $2.73, but RSI 85 signals overheating”>crypto-access-for-3500-companies/” title=”South Korea advances crypto access for 3,500 companies”>Crypto-Theft-Who-Flaunted-It-On-Instagram-1.jpg” alt=”ZachXBT’s New Crypto Support Site To Block UK, India, Canada” loading=”lazy”>

Crypto investigator ZachXBT plans to launch a website that will restrict support requests from jurisdictions he calls “low quality,” naming Canada, the UK, India, Nigeria, Morocco, Algeria and Bangladesh after repeated failures by local authorities to act on blockchain evidence in theft and frozen-funds cases. He cited Toronto as a major fraud center and examples of Indian law enforcement mishandling cases, including arrests of crypto exchange founders, and said he will prioritize jurisdictions likely to cooperate; the move highlights security and law enforcement gaps that could reduce victim recovery options and hinder broader crypto adoption and cross-border fraud response.

See what traders are focused on

Crypto investigator ZachXBT plans to launch a new website for handling crypto fraud cases. Meanwhile, he says crypto victims from Canada, the UK, India, Nigeria, as well as Morocco, Algeria, and Bangladesh may be blocked from getting support. 

He says the decision comes from repeated problems with authorities while trying to help victims recover stolen funds.

ZachXBT Wants to Limit Future Support Requests

In a recent telegram post, ZachXBT said his upcoming website will restrict access from what he described as “low quality countries.” 

He said the decision is based on his own experience handling crypto theft cases, particularly where local authorities failed to act on evidence or provide enough help to victims.

He listed Canada, the UK, India and Nigeria among the jurisdictions where he has had some of his worst experiences. He also added Morocco, Algeria and Bangladesh in his fifth spot.

The list does not mean crypto victims from these countries are involved in wrongdoing. ZachXBT’s criticism is aimed at how he says the authorities in these regions handle crypto fraud cases.

Canada and India Face Strong Criticism

Canada received the strongest criticism from ZachXBT. He said he has dealt with cases where detailed information about threat actors was provided to authorities, but victims still did not receive enough help.

He also pointed to Toronto as a major fraud center and said Canadian agencies have sometimes failed to act even when evidence was available. Similar concerns were raised about India.

ZachXBT gave examples in which Indian law enforcement allegedly contacted him for help with frozen funds, while other cases involved emails used in attempts to unfreeze funds linked to the Lazarus Group. He also claimed Indian authorities once arrested crypto exchange founders after confusing a phishing website with a legitimate platform.

Further, when ZachXBT was askedwhy he included Morocco and Algeria on the list, he gave a stronger response. He claimed that “governments are useless” and alleged that some people involved in home-invasion robberies come from those regions

These are ZachXBT’s claims based on his reported case experience, rather than independent findings against the countries or their entire law enforcement systems.

ZachXBT Plans Selective Crypto Investigations

The planned website appears aimed at making ZachXBT’s support work more selective. Instead of handling every request, he said he would prioritize users from jurisdictions where authorities are more likely to respond and act on blockchain evidence.

Some praised the decision, saying investigators should not waste time on cases where authorities refuse to cooperate.

Others pushed back, arguing that victims should not lose access to help because of their nationality or location.

Source: cryptorank.io