Don't want to trade it yourself?
Our desk runs DEX portfolios on profit share.
The Senate killed the CLARITY Act with a 49-50 vote, and XRP, <a href="https://xpertsstudio.com/where-will-xrp-bitcoin-and-ethereum-be-by-year-end-now-that-the-clarity-act-has-failed/” title=”Where Will XRP, Bitcoin and Ethereum Be by Year End Now That the CLARITY Act Has Failed?”>Ethereum, and Solana all took the hit. But the price damage each coin suffered tells a different story about what was actually at stake for each one.
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
XRP (CRYPTO: XRP), Ethereum (CRYPTO: ETH), and Solana (CRYPTO: SOL) fell after the Senate failed to advance the CLARITY Act with a 49-50 vote against cloture, but investors had different reasons to care.
XRPholders wanted federal rules to reinforce its status as a non-security. Ethereumholders were watching for clearer rules on staking, validators, and applications built on the network. Solana had already been gaining institutional access through ETF-related products under the SEC’s generic listing standards, adopted in September 2025, yet its price still fell when the bill stalled.
The Senate vote fell 11 votes short of the 60 needed for cloture, sending crypto prices lower and leaving investors to wonder which coin took the biggest hit. We turned to ChatGPT to compare the damage across XRP, Solana, and Ethereum.
What XRP, Ethereum and Solana Stood to Gain From CLARITY Act
XRP, Ethereum, and Solana were looking for different things from the CLARITY Act, which helps explain why the Senate setback did not carry the same significance for each one. XRP already had ajoint SEC-CFTC interpretationtreating it as a non-security in secondary trading, but the CLARITY Act could have turned that regulatory position into federal law.
As ChatGPT noted, a future administration can reverse an agency interpretation, while changing a statute requires Congress to act, so XRP holders were seeking legal protection for a status they already largely have in practice.
Ethereum had a broader regulatory problem because the open questions extend beyond the asset to staking, validator economics, DeFi, and applications built on the network. Those areas remain more dependent on agency guidance that can change over time, leaving the wider Ethereum ecosystem without the certainty that legislation provides.
Solana had less to gain from theCLARITY Acton the institutional-access front because its access to ETF-related products was already developing under the SEC’s generic listing standards, giving the token a separate route into traditional investment products.
The legislation could still have provided broader statutory certainty and a nationwide framework for the Solana ecosystem, but that was different from XRP’s push to codify an existing regulatory position or Ethereum’s need for clearer rules across staking, DeFi, and validators.
How the Market Reacted to the CLARITY Act Setback
On the day the Senate vote failed, XRP fell about 7.98%, about 5.6 times as much as Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC), which declined 1.42%, while Solana dropped about 3.67% and Ethereum lost about 6%. By price reaction alone, the order was clear, with XRP taking the biggest hit, followed by Ethereum and then Solana. That ranking, however, does not necessarily show which coin had the most at stake in the legislation.
The two rankings happen to line up here, but for different reasons. Ethereum’s larger decline reflects the regulatory questions tied directly to its ecosystem staking, DeFi, and tokenized assets that remain unresolved without the bill. Solana’s smaller decline reflects that its institutional access already had a separate path through ETF-related products, leaving it less exposed to this particular setback. The overlap in ordering is coincidental, not evidence that price reaction reliably tracks regulatory stakes.
The three coins have since recovered part of those losses, with XRP trading near $1.29, Ethereum around $2,450, and Solana near $101 as of September 17. XRP showed the sharpest immediate response, while Ethereum’s decline reflected unresolved issues in staking, DeFi, and tokenized assets that the CLARITY Act could have addressed.
What Regulators Can Still Deliver Without the CLARITY Act
Bernstein’sGautam Chhugani identified five areas where the SEC and CFTC could still deliver some of what the CLARITY Act sought, including clearer token rules, DeFi and self-custody protections, equity-tokenization exemptions, faster approval of real-world-asset perpetual futures, and treating sports event contracts as swaps.
Several directly affect Ethereum, particularly DeFi, tokenized assets, and perpetual futures, so agency action could ease some of the uncertainty the CLARITY Act was meant to address without replacing the legislation.
XRP faces a harder gap because agency action cannot provide the statutory protection it sought from CLARITY. Its non-security treatment still rests on regulatory action, leaving open the possibility that a future SEC administration could take a different position. For XRP, that makes the bill’s failure much harder to offset through agency guidance.
Solanahad less riding on the CLARITY Act for institutional access because that path was already developing, with a VanEck fund holding SOL directly and Bitwise’s Solana staking product already available. The bill could still have provided broader statutory certainty, but Solana was not relying on it for the same immediate access to investment products.
Which Coin Lost the Most?
XRP, Ethereum, and Solana fell in that order, and the price reaction lines up with what each coin had at stake in the legislation. XRP had the most to lose because its main prize was statutory protection that regulators cannot make permanent, while Solana had the least at stake because its institutional route was already open.
Ethereum fell between them, with broader regulatory questions around staking, DeFi, and tokenized assets still unresolved. The market scoreboard captures the size of each move but not the reason behind it. Ethereum’s decline stems from unresolved ecosystem-wide questions, while Solana’s smaller drop reflects that options CLARITY wasn’t going to change either way.
As ChatGPT noted, the failed vote did not newly classify XRP, Ethereum, or Solana as securities or commodities because the Senate simplyfailed to invoke clotureon the motion to proceed.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.
Sam Daodu is a crypto analyst who’s spent nearly a decade making blockchain understandable—no easy task when most whitepapers read like fever dreams. He writes for 24/7 Wall St., covering Bitcoin, altcoins, and crypto market analysis for investors. Before crypto, he was a tech writer (back when explaining “the cloud” was peak innovation). Since 2018, he’s written for CoinTelegraph, Yahoo Finance, The Block, Cryptonews, Zypto, Rain, and more—basically anywhere people want crypto news without the headache. Sam runs MacLabs Marketing, a content agency for crypto brands tired of sounding like AI wrote their website. He also publishes free crypto education on his site for Web3 enthusiasts who think “gas fees” is a typo. When he’s not writing or staring at charts, Sam’s either: – Watching anime (currently convinced One Piece has better tokenomics than most altcoins) – At the gym sculpting himself into a Greek god – Listening to the music your mum warned you only bad boys listen to Connect: LinkedIn | Email | MacLabs Marketing
Source: 247wallst.com