Don't want to trade it yourself?
Our desk runs DEX portfolios on profit share.
Senate Republicans Fail to Advance Crypto Regulation Bill Amid Trump Family Ethics Concerns
Wednesday, 16 September 2026, 19:10
President Donald Trump steps off Marine One at Shannon Airport in Shannon, Ireland, on September 13. Anna Moneymaker/
A bitter dispute over presidential business interests has exposed the political obstacle threatening years of crypto industry lobbying.
For years, the cryptocurrency industry invested millions of dollars in lobbying for rules designed to integrate digital assets more deeply into the traditional financial system. After Donald Trump changed his stance on cryptocurrencies in 2024, industry representatives counted on his help in overcoming regulatory uncertainty.
However, Senate Republicans failed to pass a key procedural vote on a cryptocurrency regulation bill. One of the main reasons was the president’s own crypto interests: Donald Trump and his sons launched several projects that brought the family more than $1 billion.
Democrats, including Senator Elizabeth Warren, said the bill did not impose sufficient restrictions on officials who might trade digital assets. They called for stronger ethics rules for people involved in shaping cryptocurrency policy.
This bill effectively says, “Do whatever you want, Mr. President.” That is fundamentally wrong. We need cryptocurrency regulation, including a rule that would prohibit anyone involved in shaping cryptocurrency policy from buying, selling, or exchanging digital assets.
Republicans and some Democrats defended the bill. They said opponents had changed their demands after a year of negotiations. Supporters of the legislation also presented updated ethics provisions that had been approved by the White House.
Democrats will probably never be satisfied.
– John Thune, Senate majority leader
Democratic Senator Ruben Gallego, who participated in the negotiations, accused Republicans of ending the consultations prematurely and trying to force the Senate to vote without reaching a compromise.
The bill needs 60 votes to pass. Instead of trying to appease President Trump, Republicans should have worked more closely with Senate Democrats and prepared legislation with meaningful ethics provisions.
Consequences of the Failed Vote for the Crypto Market
The failed vote was yet another disappointment for the cryptocurrency industry during Donald Trump’s second presidential term. His administration appointed industry supporters to financial regulatory agencies, proposed creating a strategic bitcoin reserve, and the Securities and Exchange Commission dropped a number of cases against cryptocurrency companies and investors linked to the president’s family.
Despite support from the administration, bitcoin has lost most of its gains from the past year. Following news of the bill’s failure, its price fell 4% to approximately $75,700. Coinbase shares dropped 10%, while securities of stablecoin issuer Circle fell 11%.
Market participants, however, do not view one failed vote as a threat to the industry as a whole. The cryptocurrency sector is already 16 years old, and its total market value stands at approximately $2.5 trillion.
The world’s largest banks and asset managers are already building digital asset infrastructure. One vote will not undo that commitment. Despite this setback, we will continue investing in and developing the industry and working constructively with U.S. policymakers, because we believe regulatory clarity is a matter of time, not possibility.
– David Mercer, CEO of trading platform LMAX Group
The events surrounding the bill showed that Donald Trump’s personal cryptocurrency interests may continue to complicate the adoption of rules the industry has awaited for years. For the crypto market, this means that political support from the president does not guarantee the swift establishment of clear regulatory standards.
- The US Senate blocked procedural advancement of the Clarity crypto bill after bipartisan opposition, exposing limits on the industry’s political influence despite millions in spending.
Source: mezha.net