Don't want to trade it yourself?
Our desk runs DEX portfolios on profit share.
Crypto News
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission acknowledged on Tuesday that a portion of its past enforcement actions against cryptocurrency firms produced no measurable benefit for investors and reflected a misreading of federal securities laws.
In a statement reviewing its 2025 enforcement results, the SEC said that since fiscal year 2022, it had brought 95 actions and imposed $2.3 billion in penalties for what it classified as book-and-record violations. Seven crypto firm registration–related cases and six cases involving the definition of a dealer were grouped in the same assessment.
The agency said these cases identified no direct investor harm from the underlying violations and generated no investor protection in return. It described the pattern as a bias toward case volume over substantive investor protection outcomes, as well as a misallocation of agency re
The SEC also said that in the period leading up to January 2025, its enforcement division had engaged in what it called an unprecedented rush to file cases and had aggressively pursued novel legal theories. That approach drew criticism for prioritizing headline-generating penalties over matters of genuine investor harm.
SEC Chair Paul Atkins, who took over leadership of the agency in April 2025, said the commission has since redirected its priorities. He said the SEC is now focused on fraud, market manipulation, and breaches of fiduciary duty, and has moved away from pursuing volume-based enforcement that generated large penalty figures without corresponding investor benefit.
Consulting firm Cornerstone Research reported in November that enforcement actions against public companies, including crypto-related cases, declined by roughly 30% in fiscal 2025 under Atkins compared with fiscal 2024. In connection with 2025 enforcement overall, the SEC said it obtained orders totaling $17.9 billion in monetary relief, comprising $7.2 billion in civil penalties and the remainder in disgorgement and prejudgment interest.
Several crypto firms were still subject to enforcement in 2025 despite the shift. The SEC sued Unicoin and four current and former executives in May 2025, alleging they raised $100 million by misleading investors about certificates tied to token rights andequity. Unicoin has contested the agency’s characterization of its regulatory filings.
The SEC also filed a civil complaint against Praetorian Group International CEO Ramil Ventura Palafox in April 2025, alleging he orchestrated a $200 million Ponzi scheme. A parallel Department of Justice criminal case ended in February with Palafox receiving a 20-year prison sentence.
This article contains links to third-party websites or other content for information purposes only (“Third-Party Sites”). The Third-Party Sites are not under the control of CoinMarketCap, and CoinMarketCap is not responsible for the content of any Third-Party Site, including without limitation any link contained in a Third-Party Site, or any changes or updates to a Third-Party Site. CoinMarketCap is providing these links to you only as a convenience, and the inclusion of any link does not imply endorsement, approval or recommendation by CoinMarketCap of the site or any association with its operators. This article is intended to be used and must be used for informational purposes only. It is important to do your own research and analysis before making any material decisions related to any of the products or services described. This article is not intended as, and shall not be construed as, financial advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are the author’s [company’s] own and do not necessarily reflect those of CoinMarketCap.
Source: coinmarketcap.com