In December 2021, JPMorgan paid $200 million in fines for
failing to monitor employee communications on unauthorized channels like
WhatsApp and iMessage. At first, it looked like a high-profile anomaly. But by
2023, that fine had sparked a $1.8 billion enforcement wave across 16 major
financial firms.
These penalties weren’t just about tech misuse—they
revealed a broader failure to monitor informal communications in regulated
environments. What began as a crackdown on messaging apps became a reckoning
for firms that had overlooked long-standing recordkeeping rules.
The issue wasn’t the tools, but the behaviors. For years,
firms focused compliance on emails and formal channels, dismissing chat apps
and personal devices as outside regulatory scope. The SEC disagreed. This was a
systemic blind spot, not a tech glitch.
The fines were just a cost of doing business:
They paid $920 million in penalties.
Sounds huge, right?
For a bank making billions in profit, it was pocket change.
But the system was working exactly as designed: pic.twitter.com/aZs2Hoo16t
— Neal Taparia (@nealtaparia) December 2, 2024
The rules hadn’t changed—only their enforcement had.
Informal messages, once seen as harmless, were in fact business communications
that went unrecorded and unmonitored.
The Cost of Misreading Deregulation
Between 2017 and 2020, a lighter regulatory tone lulled
many firms into reducing compliance efforts. But the SEC’s crackdown revealed
the dangers of mistaking reduced enforcement for reduced responsibility.
Periods of deregulation offer a false sense of security.
As history has shown—from the mortgage crisis to the Wells Fargo
scandal—regulators may step back, but they don’t forget. When they return, they
act decisively, often retroactively.
U.S. regulators on Tuesday announced a combined $549 million in penalties against Wall Street firms that failed to maintain electronic records of employee communications.
The firms admitted that from at least 2019, employees used side channels like WhatsApp to discuss company… pic.twitter.com/oTNkzurDec
— Kat Stryker (@KatStryker111) August 9, 2023
Retroactive Fines: A Regulatory Time Machine
The most startling part of the SEC’s action was how far
back it reached. Many violations dated as far back as 2018, years before the
JPMorgan case brought these issues to light. Regulators used past
communications to enforce old rules—proving they don’t need to catch firms in
real-time to penalize them.
Even under new leadership in 2025, with Paul Atkins as
SEC Chair, firms found no leniency. Sixteen appealed to reduce their fines;
none succeeded. The message: mobile compliance isn’t political—it’s permanent.
You may find it interesting at FinanceMagnates.com: When
a “Smile” Means More Than You Think: Emojis and Compliance Risks.
What Smart Firms Are Doing Now
Some firms took the 2021 fines as a warning and acted
early. Here’s what they’re doing now:
End-to-end capture: Deploying
audit-ready systems that record all relevant communication, from emails to
mobile messaging to emerging platforms like TikTok.
Clear communication policies: Establishing and
enforcing guidelines on informal messaging channels, with comprehensive
training for staff.
Internal transparency: Encouraging
teams to escalate compliance risks internally before they become public
scandals.
Future-proofing technology: Using quieter
enforcement periods to upgrade systems, replace outdated tools, and invest in
scalable, compliant communication solutions.
These firms understand that compliance is about
resilience—not just avoiding penalties.
BREAKING
The SEC announced charges against 16 Wall Street firms for widespread and longstanding failures to maintain and preserve electronic communications. The firms agreed to pay combined penalties of more than $1.1 billion.
List includes: $MS, $GS, $CS, $C and more below. pic.twitter.com/hTEmDEA37V
— unusual_whales (@unusual_whales) September 27, 2022
Fairness or Strategy?
Some critics argue the penalties weren’t evenly applied.
Why did some firms pay more than others for the same mistake?
It’s a fair question, but regulators aren’t chasing
fairness. They’re setting standards. Firms that self-disclosed, cooperated, or
acted early received better outcomes. That’s not favoritism—it’s the SEC’s
playbook for building a culture of proactive compliance.
The Deregulation Fallacy
Ultimately, the messaging probe revealed a dangerous
belief: that silence from regulators means safety. In reality, that’s when
risks quietly accumulate. Deregulation may soften tone, but it doesn’t erase
the rules—or the consequences of ignoring them.
From JPMorgan’s $200 million fine to the industry’s $1.8
billion reckoning, the lesson is clear: compliance doesn’t wait for
enforcement. And with retroactive penalties now the norm, today’s oversight
gaps could become tomorrow’s billion-dollar failures.
In December 2021, JPMorgan paid $200 million in fines for
failing to monitor employee communications on unauthorized channels like
WhatsApp and iMessage. At first, it looked like a high-profile anomaly. But by
2023, that fine had sparked a $1.8 billion enforcement wave across 16 major
financial firms.
These penalties weren’t just about tech misuse—they
revealed a broader failure to monitor informal communications in regulated
environments. What began as a crackdown on messaging apps became a reckoning
for firms that had overlooked long-standing recordkeeping rules.
The issue wasn’t the tools, but the behaviors. For years,
firms focused compliance on emails and formal channels, dismissing chat apps
and personal devices as outside regulatory scope. The SEC disagreed. This was a
systemic blind spot, not a tech glitch.
The fines were just a cost of doing business:
They paid $920 million in penalties.
Sounds huge, right?
For a bank making billions in profit, it was pocket change.
But the system was working exactly as designed: pic.twitter.com/aZs2Hoo16t
— Neal Taparia (@nealtaparia) December 2, 2024
The rules hadn’t changed—only their enforcement had.
Informal messages, once seen as harmless, were in fact business communications
that went unrecorded and unmonitored.
The Cost of Misreading Deregulation
Between 2017 and 2020, a lighter regulatory tone lulled
many firms into reducing compliance efforts. But the SEC’s crackdown revealed
the dangers of mistaking reduced enforcement for reduced responsibility.
Periods of deregulation offer a false sense of security.
As history has shown—from the mortgage crisis to the Wells Fargo
scandal—regulators may step back, but they don’t forget. When they return, they
act decisively, often retroactively.
U.S. regulators on Tuesday announced a combined $549 million in penalties against Wall Street firms that failed to maintain electronic records of employee communications.
The firms admitted that from at least 2019, employees used side channels like WhatsApp to discuss company… pic.twitter.com/oTNkzurDec
— Kat Stryker (@KatStryker111) August 9, 2023
Retroactive Fines: A Regulatory Time Machine
The most startling part of the SEC’s action was how far
back it reached. Many violations dated as far back as 2018, years before the
JPMorgan case brought these issues to light. Regulators used past
communications to enforce old rules—proving they don’t need to catch firms in
real-time to penalize them.
Even under new leadership in 2025, with Paul Atkins as
SEC Chair, firms found no leniency. Sixteen appealed to reduce their fines;
none succeeded. The message: mobile compliance isn’t political—it’s permanent.
You may find it interesting at FinanceMagnates.com: When
a “Smile” Means More Than You Think: Emojis and Compliance Risks.
What Smart Firms Are Doing Now
Some firms took the 2021 fines as a warning and acted
early. Here’s what they’re doing now:
End-to-end capture: Deploying
audit-ready systems that record all relevant communication, from emails to
mobile messaging to emerging platforms like TikTok.
Clear communication policies: Establishing and
enforcing guidelines on informal messaging channels, with comprehensive
training for staff.
Internal transparency: Encouraging
teams to escalate compliance risks internally before they become public
scandals.
Future-proofing technology: Using quieter
enforcement periods to upgrade systems, replace outdated tools, and invest in
scalable, compliant communication solutions.
These firms understand that compliance is about
resilience—not just avoiding penalties.
BREAKING
The SEC announced charges against 16 Wall Street firms for widespread and longstanding failures to maintain and preserve electronic communications. The firms agreed to pay combined penalties of more than $1.1 billion.
List includes: $MS, $GS, $CS, $C and more below. pic.twitter.com/hTEmDEA37V
— unusual_whales (@unusual_whales) September 27, 2022
Fairness or Strategy?
Some critics argue the penalties weren’t evenly applied.
Why did some firms pay more than others for the same mistake?
It’s a fair question, but regulators aren’t chasing
fairness. They’re setting standards. Firms that self-disclosed, cooperated, or
acted early received better outcomes. That’s not favoritism—it’s the SEC’s
playbook for building a culture of proactive compliance.
The Deregulation Fallacy
Ultimately, the messaging probe revealed a dangerous
belief: that silence from regulators means safety. In reality, that’s when
risks quietly accumulate. Deregulation may soften tone, but it doesn’t erase
the rules—or the consequences of ignoring them.
From JPMorgan’s $200 million fine to the industry’s $1.8
billion reckoning, the lesson is clear: compliance doesn’t wait for
enforcement. And with retroactive penalties now the norm, today’s oversight
gaps could become tomorrow’s billion-dollar failures.
