Refuting the “Ethereum Abandons ETH” Narrative: What Does It Really Mean to Pay Gas Without ETH?

imToken特邀专栏作者
2026-09-12 07:00
This article is about 3223 words, reading the full article takes about 5 minutes
Ethereum is betting that once the Gas barrier disappears, more people will genuinely start using Ethereum.
AI Summary
Expand

• Core Argument: EIP-8141 frame transactions allow users to transfer funds without holding ETH, with Gas fees paid by Paymasters and settled in stablecoins like USDC. However, this does not eliminate ETH’s role as the underlying Gas settlement asset — it only changes the location and form of ETH demand.
• Key Elements:
  1. Current Ethereum accounts bind the signer, transaction initiator, and Gas payer together. EIP-8141 splits these three roles into multiple Frames that separately handle verification, payment, and execution.
  2. A Paymaster or application pays ETH Gas on behalf of the user, who then settles fees with the Paymaster using ERC-20 tokens like USDC, meaning users no longer need to perceive ETH Gas costs.
  3. ERC-4337 already enables similar functionality, but EIP-8141 natively embeds Gas abstraction capability into Ethereum’s transaction structure itself, rather than relying on external infrastructure.
  4. Frame transactions can bundle operations into atomic batches, such as combining Approve and Swap into a single execution that automatically rolls back on failure, eliminating residual authorization risks.
  5. ETH demand shifts from being held by a large number of retail wallets to being held by a smaller number of Paymasters and applications with larger turnover balances. However, Paymasters have inventory management strategies, so this does not directly translate into market buy pressure.
  6. The core criterion for judgment: whether the UX improvement can bring real incremental users and on-chain activity. If total transaction volume increases, ETH consumption and burning would actually rise.

If you’ve spent any time onchain, you’ve probably run into these awkward situations:

You receive a stablecoin in a new address, but when you try to send it out, a pop-up tells you there’s no ETH to pay for Gas; you want to swap a token on a DEX, but you get stuck; you withdraw some USDC from a trading platform, only to realize you didn’t prepare any Gas…

In all these cases, you have to go find a fiat on-ramp somewhere else or beg people to send you a bit of “water” — arguably the most classic newbie turn-off moment in the Crypto world.

Recently, Vitalik Buterin mentioned progress on EIP-8141 (Frame Transactions), once again pushing new possibilities to the forefront: in the future, you won’t need ETH in your wallet to send a transfer directly, Gas can be deducted directly from USDC, and some applications may even cover Gas for you entirely just to attract users.

Once the news spread, it quickly fermented into a scary hot take: “If you no longer need ETH to use Ethereum, what value does ETH even have?”

The answer isn’t that simple.

What users pay fees with and what the Ethereum protocol ultimately settles fees in are actually two completely different things.

1. What Does It Actually Mean to Pay Gas Without ETH?

Let’s start with an ordinary Ethereum transaction today.

For example, Frank has 1,000 USDC in his wallet and wants to send 100 USDC to a friend, but as long as his wallet has no ETH, the transaction can’t go through.

The reason is simple: the logic of a regular Ethereum account today is very rigid — the person initiating the transaction is also the person responsible for paying the network Gas. Frank signs, Frank initiates the transaction, and Frank’s ETH balance pays the Gas — these three things are basically bound together.

What EIP-8141 wants to do is separate them.

Under the current design, a Frame Transaction can be split into multiple different “Frames,” each responsible for verifying the transaction, confirming who pays the Gas, and actually executing the user’s operation.

So in the future, when Frank makes a transfer, it could work like this: Frank still signs, proving “this 100 USDC is indeed what I want to transfer,” but a separate Paymaster or account provides the ETH and pays Gas to the Ethereum network on Frank’s behalf, and Frank then pays this Paymaster a small amount of USDC as a fee.

From Frank’s perspective, all he might see is transferring 100 USDC with a network fee of 0.1 USDC. Throughout the entire process, he doesn’t even need to know how much the ETH Gas costs, nor does he need to prepare ETH in advance.

But from the Ethereum protocol’s perspective, things haven’t turned into “Ethereum starts accepting USDC as Gas” — someone is simply paying Gas in ETH on Frank’s behalf in the background, and then settling with Frank in USDC.

The ERC-20 payment example officially provided for EIP-8141 has a similar structure, where a Sponsor approves and bears the Gas, and the user can transfer ERC-20 Tokens to the Sponsor as a fee.

It’s easier to understand if you compare it to real-life consumption.

When we go to Japan and swipe a RMB credit card, what the user perceives is “RMB being deducted,” while the merchant may receive yen. But this doesn’t mean Japan’s underlying settlement currency has therefore become RMB — the front-end payment asset and the back-end settlement asset can naturally be different things.

What EIP-8141 does is essentially a similar abstraction. In the end, users no longer need to personally hold ETH; another account can pay the ETH Gas on their behalf, and then settle the fee using assets like USDC.

These two things look like they differ by only a few words, but their implications for ETH are completely different.

2. Why Does Ethereum Insist on “Hiding” Gas?

In fact, “not having to prepare ETH yourself” is not an entirely new idea.

The Account Abstraction and Paymaster introduced by ERC-4337 already allow smart accounts to implement Gas Sponsorship, where applications can pay fees on behalf of users, and users can also bear fees using stablecoins.

The thing is, ERC-4337 can do it, but it’s more about adding a set of UserOperation, Bundler, EntryPoint, and Paymaster infrastructure outside the protocol, whereas EIP-8141 attempts to embed this kind of capability more natively into Ethereum’s transaction structure itself.

Ultimately, the core is to solve a problem that should have been solved long ago: why should ordinary users have to understand what Gas is?

In real life, when you send a friend 200 yuan you to “go buy two yuan worth of settlement tokens on another platform first.”

But Crypto used to torture people exactly like this.

On Ethereum you need to prepare ETH, on Solana you have to get SOL, on BNB Chain you have to stockpile BNB, and even if you switch to a new L2, your first instinct is to check whether your wallet has any starting funds. Veterans might spend two minutes bridging and get past it, but for outsiders, this is a chasm that can make them close the webpage and leave immediately.

Beyond hiding Gas, Frame Transactions can also conveniently solve quite a few chronic problems.

For example, right now, to trade a new token on a DEX, you have to click Approve to authorize first, then click Swap, with the wallet popping up confirmation windows twice. If the subsequent Swap fails, the earlier authorization remains hanging onchain long-term, leaving behind a risk of theft.

With Frames, these two things can be packaged directly into a single atomic batch: if the Swap fails, the earlier authorization automatically rolls back along with it, clean and tidy.

This touches on a bigger imaginative space: in the future, who authorizes, who executes, who pays, and how verification is done can all be split apart and recombined.

3. So Is This Bullish or Bearish for ETH?

This is also the place where this round of discussion most easily slides toward two extremes.

One view is, “If you no longer need ETH to pay Gas in the future, ETH has no value,” while the other is, “Lower barriers for users mean transaction volume will explode, so it’s super bullish for ETH.”

For a major architectural reform involving the underlying protocol user experience, it’s still hard to draw a conclusion right now, but one thing is certain: EIP-8141 has not canceled ETH’s role as Ethereum’s underlying Gas and fee settlement asset.

Users may not perceive ETH, but the Paymaster, application, or other account responsible for paying on the user’s behalf still needs to be able to bear network fees denominated in ETH, and the existing EIP-1559 fee market has not been replaced by stablecoins because of Frames.

What changes is only the location of ETH demand.

Today it might be 1 million users, each holding a little ETH in their wallet for Gas; in the future, it could become a small number of Paymasters, wallet service providers, and applications holding larger ETH working balances, and then handling Gas uniformly on behalf of a large number of ordinary users.

Of course, don’t naively think that “every time a user pays a stablecoin, the backend will go to the secondary market and market-buy an equivalent amount of ETH.” Payment agents have their own inventory management and hedging strategies, and it’s hard for this to translate directly into the instant buy pressure retail investors fantasize about.

Paymasters can prepare inventory in advance, dynamically replenish positions, or adopt other treasury management approaches, so merely from “stablecoins can be used to pay Gas in the future,” it’s very hard to directly infer how much new buy pressure ETH will generate as a result.

The real deciding factor comes down to only one logic: after the experience is optimized, does it ultimately bring more real demand for using Ethereum, and can it actually grow the pie?

Doing the math makes it intuitive:

• If in the past 100 people intended to enter, 70 of them gave up halfway after being worn down by buying Gas, calculating Gwei, and bridging, and in the end only 30 completed transactions;
• If in the future the wallet swallows all that hassle into the backend and lets 80 people smoothly complete their transactions — even if they don’t hold a single bit of ETH — the network’s actual ETH consumption and burn would still be far greater than before;

Conversely, if the entire ecosystem simply cannot bring incremental activity, and it merely shifts from “paying out of your own pocket” to “finding someone to pay on your behalf,” then indeed no new incremental value will be generated.

Final Thoughts

From the author’s perspective, what it weakens is the notion that “every user must stock up a little ETH in advance to use Ethereum,” but what it bets on is that once this barrier disappears, more people will genuinely start using Ethereum.

For ordinary users, there’s of course still no need to change their usage habits because of this EIP right now, but from the perspective of wallet development, the direction it points toward is already very clear.

In the future, a good wallet should increasingly avoid requiring users to first understand Gas. Users are responsible for deciding where their assets should go and what operations they want to execute; the wallet is responsible for telling them what the risks are and how much it will ultimately cost; and as for which account should pay, whether to bill in ETH or stablecoins, and whether there is an available Gas Sponsor — these complex protocol details should gradually be hidden in the backend.

Truly mature infrastructure often works exactly this way.

ETH
Welcome to Join Odaily Official Community
Subscription Group：
https://t.me/Odaily_News
Chat Group：
https://t.me/Odaily_GoldenApe
Official Account：
https://twitter.com/OdailyChina
Chat Group：
https://t.me/Odaily_CryptoPunk
Recommended Articles

Weekly Editor’s Picks (0905-0911)

BIT Research: Bitcoin Up 22%, Gold Up 9.4% — Will the Fed Ignite a Q4 Rally?

After UNIfication: Uniswap’s Protocol Revenue and the New UNI Value Capture Framework

Search
Article Catalog
Author Library
imToken
From Ethereum to AI’s “CROPS”: What Exactly Are These “Slow Variables” Vitalik Keeps Emphasizing?
When the World Cup Meets Agent: From Web2 to Web3, How Are Wallets Evolving Toward Agentic Wallets?
From a “Single Foundation” to “Multi-Node Governance”: Is Ethereum Undergoing a Silent Power Restructuring?
Article Ranking
Daily
Weekly

Hunter Biden’s Meme Coin Farce Comes to an End: LAPTOP Hits $200 Billion Market Cap at Open, Crashes 99% Overnight
Solana is getting anxious: Official backing propels a memecoin past $100M market cap overnight, Toly looks to win over Robinhood
USD/JPY Breaks 155 for the Third Time: The Twilight of Dollar Carry Trades?
Comparing Four Chains’ US Stock Tokenization: BNB Chain, Robinhood Chain, Base, Solana
Fomo “Top 4” Whale’s Practical Sharing: Earning $5 Million in This Meme Cycle Through Insight
Download Odaily App
Let Some People Understand Web3.0 First
IOSAndroid
About UsContact UsJoin UsFriendly LinksAdvertising Cooperation
User AgreementPrivacy PolicyDisclaimerOdaily Brand Media Kit | Official Logo & Visual Guidelines
Beijing Ruike Culture Media Co., Ltd.
京ICP备 2026027382号京公网安备11010502060861号

Source: www.odaily.news