Ethereum Plans to Allow Stablecoin Gas Payments: Will ETH Demand Be Weakened?

2026.09.08
Share<a href="https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=&text=<a href="https://xpertsstudio.com/ethereum-draws-attention-for-eip/” title=”Ethereum draws attention for EIP”>Ethereum%20Plans%20to%20Allow%20Stablecoin%20Gas%20Payments%3A%20Will%20ETH%20Demand%20Be%20Weakened%3F” rel=”nofollow noopener” target=”_blank”>Share to X (Twitter)Share to WeChatShare to WeChat
Share to WeiboShare by Link
Share by Image
For ETH, this is a structural shift from retail holdings to institutional holdings.

On September 7, a tweet spread across X: “Ethereum’s next major upgrade will allow users to pay transaction fees with stablecoins instead of ETH.”

The comment section immediately exploded. Leo Lanza from the Ethereum community posted a key correction within an hour: “The protocol layer will not accept USDC as Gas. Ethereum’s Gas settlement remains ETH; it just appears from the user’s perspective that they are paying with USDC.”

What’s the truth?

Frame Transactions: What is a transaction split into?

At the August 27 Ethereum Core Developers Meeting (ACDE), EIP-8141 was officially upgraded from “Considered For Inclusion” (CFI) to “Scheduled For Inclusion” (SFI), entering the formal schedule for the 2027 Hegotá hard fork. This marks Ethereum’s next major protocol upgrade following Glamsterdam later this year.

Officially named “Frame Transactions,” EIP-8141 was jointly proposed by 10 authors, including Vitalik Buterin. Its core change can be summarized in one sentence: splitting a single transaction from an “indivisible monolithic operation” into up to 64 programmable “Frames.” Each Frame handles a different logic—verifying identity, paying Gas, executing operations—independently yet atomically bound.

Once split, the most direct change is: the account sending assets and the account paying Gas no longer have to be the same.

A payment app can cover the user’s Gas fee on their behalf; a DeFi protocol can bundle Gas costs into its own service fees; a wallet can deduct an equivalent amount from the user’s stablecoin balance and use its own reserve of ETH to settle on-chain fees.

The user experience is “paying Gas with USDC,” but at the protocol level, what is received from start to finish is always ETH.

The base cost per frame transaction is approximately 12,000 gas, with each additional frame adding roughly 475 gas. This overhead is negligible compared to the flexibility it unlocks.

Vitalik wrote in a September 6 post on X that work on Frames has been “quietly advancing over the past few months.” It’s worth noting that EIP-8141 is currently still in draft status, its detailed specification may still evolve, and activation is at least a year away.

How does this differ from ERC-4337?

If “Gas sponsorship” sounds familiar, your intuition is correct.

ERC-4337 was deployed on the Ethereum mainnet as early as March 2023. Through a combination of smart contract wallets, Bundlers, and Paymasters, it achieves a similar user experience to EIP-8141: users sign a UserOperation, Bundlers package and submit it, and Paymasters pay the ETH Gas fees on the user’s behalf. To date, ERC-4337 has supported over 40 million smart accounts and more than 100 million UserOperations.

EIP-8141 aims to replace the architectural flaws of ERC-4337, with both having highly overlapping functional goals.

The problem with ERC-4337 is that it is “external,” running entirely outside the Ethereum protocol: UserOperations go through a separate alt-mempool, Bundlers operate off-chain, and the EntryPoint contract acts as a singleton central node. This means every operation executed via ERC-4337 incurs roughly 20%-40% higher Gas costs compared to standard EOA transactions. Furthermore, the Bundler ecosystem is highly concentrated, with the top three operators (Pimlico, Stackup, Coinbase) processing about 78% of UserOperation volume.

EIP-8141’s goal is to move these capabilities from an “add-on layer above the protocol” directly into the “protocol itself.” Frame Transactions are a native Ethereum transaction type (type 0x06), requiring no Bundlers, no alt-mempools, and no EntryPoint contracts. Gas sponsorship, key rotation, multi-signatures, social recovery, and even post-quantum signature schemes can become native features of the Ethereum account system rather than peripheral functions implemented independently by wallet vendors.

Will ETH demand really be diluted?

Now for the core question.

The reason that tweet sparked anxiety is because many people’s subconscious reasoning chain goes like this: Users won’t need to hold ETH → Users won’t need to buy ETH → The demand side for ETH collapses.

Every arrow in this chain fails to hold up under scrutiny.

EIP-8141 changes the distribution structure of ETH demand, not the total volume.

Under the current model, every user wanting to perform any operation on Ethereum must first buy some ETH to store in their wallet for Gas. This means ETH Gas demand is scattered across millions of fragmented personal accounts, with balances often just tens of dollars, leaving vast amounts of capital trapped as “inactive Gas reserves.”

What EIP-8141 (and the already-operating ERC-4337 Paymasters) changes is that these fragmented Gas demands are consolidated into the hands of a few wallet operators, Paymaster service providers, and application developers. They need to hold substantial amounts of ETH to fulfill sponsorship obligations, and since their Gas consumption frequency is far higher than that of average users, their ETH turnover rate is also much greater.

To put it in perspective: switching to this model is like transitioning a highway from manual toll booths to an ETC system. Before the switch, every driver needed loose change in their pocket; after the switch, drivers don’t need cash anymore, but ETC operators must handle large-scale settlements with the highway authority. The highway’s total toll revenue remains unchanged, but the distribution of “who holds the coins” shifts from millions of individual wallets to the treasury pools of dozens of operators.

Ultimately, validators still receive ETH. Nothing changes at the protocol level regarding this. The EIP-1559 base fee burning mechanism remains unaffected; the base fee for every transaction continues to be denominated in ETH and burned.

Therefore, a more precise description would be: EIP-8141 may reduce retail demand where “every user must buy a little ETH,” while simultaneously consolidating that demand into the hands of professional infrastructure operators, creating larger-volume, higher-frequency wholesale purchasing.

The Actual Migration of Value Capture

If EIP-8141 activates as planned in 2027, the Gas value chain on Ethereum will transform into a four-tier structure:

Users hold stablecoins or other ERC-20 assets → Wallets or Paymasters collect users’ stablecoins and centrally purchase ETH → Applications use their own revenue or user fees to cover Gas costs → Validators receive ETH and execute the burn.

In this chain, who are the winners and losers?

The biggest beneficiaries will be the application layer.

In the user conversion funnel for a DeFi protocol or payment app, there used to be a step called “go buy some ETH to put in your wallet.” This step deterred countless potential users who already held stablecoins. EIP-8141 eliminates this friction point, directly boosting the conversion rate from “sign-up” to “first transaction.” Ethereum’s official estimates suggest ERC-4337 alone drove 20 million new smart accounts in 2024, representing a 7x annual growth rate. With native integration, EIP-8141 could further accelerate this trend.

Stablecoin issuers will also benefit. If Gas sponsorship becomes the norm, users can default to holding USDC or USDT to complete all on-chain operations, elevating stablecoins from “passive storage assets” to “active Gas fuel.” As Paymasters purchase ETH on-chain to pay for Gas, they effectively create a continuous swap flow from stablecoins to ETH.

For ETH, this represents a structural migration “from retail holdings to institutional holdings.” Total demand may not necessarily decrease (it could even rise due to improved user conversion rates), but the holder profile will undergo a fundamental shift. Previously, millions of everyday users each held small amounts of ETH; in the future, dozens of Paymasters and wallet operators will centrally hold large blocks of ETH.

This means the price formation mechanism for ETH will also change. Scattered retail buying is like drizzle: continuous but weak, without creating significant price impact. Concentrated institutional buying operates in bulk orders, potentially generating stronger buy pressure during peak Gas demand periods, but also risking more concentrated sell-offs during demand troughs. Consequently, ETH’s volatility structure may shift, becoming more akin to a wholesale commodity pricing model.

Join TechFlow official community to stay tuned

Telegram:https://t.me/TechFlowDaily

X (Twitter):https://x.com/TechFlowPost

X (Twitter) EN:https://x.com/BlockFlow_News

Add to Favorites
Share to Social Media
Author深潮 TechFlow深潮TechFlow

Source: www.techflowpost.com