Don't want to trade it yourself?
Our desk runs DEX portfolios on profit share.
- UNI7083-USD
Hayden Adams just had a week to remember. It started with Adams announcing a critical update to Uniswap, the decentralized protocol he created in 2018, and ended with him catching strays on social media from a would-be rival and a former staffer at the Securities and Exchange Commission. The uproar reflected Crypto Twitter’s penchant for posturing and drama. But it also raised real questions about the meaning of decentralization—a word that serves as a crypto catechism but whose true meaning is maddeningly unclear.
Uniswap, if you’re unfamiliar, is the most prominent name in DeFi. The name describes both a wallet and website interface, but also an openntralized trading. As for Adams’ proposed update, the most significant element would see the protocol flip on a so-called fee switch
Right now, anyone who uses the Uniswap protocol already pays a transaction fee of 0.3%. This is collected by liquidity providers, who receive the fees in return for acting as market makers and ensuring there is enough volume to trade. The new arrangement wouldn’t change what users pay, but rather reallocate 0.05% of the existing fee for the purposes of burning Uniswap tokens. The idea is roughly like a share buyback in the corporate world, and so the price of Uniswap’s cryptocurrency jumped when Adams and his team announced it.
This seems like a sensible idea. It would align the economic incentives of those operating in the Uniswap ecosystem. It would also make the whole operation more efficient by folding an external non-profit operation, the Uniswap Foundation, into the outfit known as Labs which oversees products like the website and wallet.
Not everyone applauded, though. The founder of Aerodrome, a would-be competitor to Uniswap took to X in order to trash talk Adams, suggesting liquidity providers would rush to his service instead. For good measure, he gave media interviews talking up how he just learned the names of other members of Aerodrome’s team last month—implying his project was truly decentralized while Adams’ is not.
Around this time, a woman named Amanda Fischer piled on, saying Uniswap’s “switch to centralization” was the plan all along, and suggesting that Adams’ team had cynically used decentralization in the past only as a regulatory shield. Fischer was chief of staff to former SEC Chair Gary Gensler, the most reviled figure in all of crypto, and she currently works at an advocacy group aligned with Senator Elizabeth Warren. It’s not hard to guess how her comments went over on Crypto Twitter.
Source: <a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/news/uniswap-latest-drama-shows-promise-124453058.html” target=”_blank” rel=”nofollow noopener”>finance.yahoo.com