Don't want to trade it yourself?
Our desk runs DEX portfolios on profit share.
Crypto Regulation & Derivatives News
Thailand’s financial regulator is seeking public input on a framework that would let ordinary investors gain access to crypto derivatives traded on foreign exchanges—a move that would extend the country’s growing regulatory reach over digital asset products.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) laid out the proposal on Sept. 1, targeting intermediaries that want to offer retail clients exposure to overseas digital asset derivatives. Products eligible under the framework must mirror crypto derivatives already available in Thailand, matching on underlying assets, maturity, leverage, and settlement method.
Exchange Oversight Requirements Set the Bar for Eligibility
Foreign exchanges carrying the products would also need to meet two specific conditions: clearing through a central counterparty, and operating under a regulator that belongs to recognized international regulatory or exchange organizations. A product that fails either test would be off-limits to retail clients.
In those cases, access would be limited to institutional investors only. The SEC argued that institutions carry the tools and expertise needed to evaluate products with more complex structures and greater risk exposure.
Related Article: Thailand Targets USDT and Cash in Money Laundering Crackdown
The proposal fits into Thailand’s broader push to formalize crypto derivatives within its regulated capital markets. In a March 5 notification, the SEC formally recognized cryptocurrencies and digital tokens as permissible underlying assets for derivatives contracts. The regulator is also in active discussions with the Thailand Futures Exchange on potential contract specifications.
Tailored Rules Needed as Overseas Products Differ From Domestic Ones
Rules already on the books allow intermediaries to give retail and high-net-worth clients access to overseas derivatives, but only when those products resemble ones traded in the Thai market. The SEC said that condition alone is not sufficient for crypto derivatives because overseas products vary too widely in risk profiles and structures to rely on existing rules.
The public consultation period runs through Sept. 30. The SEC has not announced when it expects any approved amendments to take effect.
Strategy Pushes Back on MSCI Index Proposal, Calls Screening Test ‘Discriminatory’
Meta: Strategy formally opposed MSCI’s index screening proposal, calling it discriminatory against digital asset treasury firms. MSCI accepts feedback until Sept. 30, with a decision due Oct. 16.
Strategy has filed a formal objection to a proposal by MSCI that it says would effectively push digital asset treasury companies out of a major global index under the cover of neutral financial criteria.
The company sent a letter to MSCI on Aug. 31, signed by Executive Chairman Michael Saylor and CEO Phong Le, calling the index provider’s consultation “discriminatory, arbitrary, and misguided” and demanding it be withdrawn. Strategy said adoption of the proposal would not affect its own operations but would compromise MSCI’s standing as an impartial index provider.
May 2026 Simulation Named Strategy for Immediate Removal
The proposal at issue would require any company with operating assets below 50% of its total assets to pass five additional financial-ratio tests. A company that triggers at least four of those flags would be removed from the MSCI Global Investable Market Indexes. MSCI opened the consultation last month as an extension of a 2025 review into whether digital asset treasury firms belonged in its indices. That earlier review ended in January when MSCI chose not to exclude them, saying it would reassess its methodology.
When MSCI ran a simulation of the proposed screening in May 2026, Strategy, Metaplanet, and uranium company Yellow Cake came up for immediate deletion. SharpLink was flagged for the watchlist.
Strategy’s letter challenged the screening’s foundational logic. It argued that “operating” and “non-operating” are not defined terms under US GAAP, IFRS, or existing securities law, meaning the test rests on criteria MSCI itself has not formally established. The company added that it reports its Bitcoin (BTC) treasury as an operating segment and books related gains and losses as operating expenses, a treatment it reached in consultation with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.
Related Article: Strategy Raises $2B in Stock Sales, Launches New Bitcoin-Focused Cash Pool
This article contains links to third-party websites or other content for information purposes only (“Third-Party Sites”). The Third-Party Sites are not under the control of CoinMarketCap, and CoinMarketCap is not responsible for the content of any Third-Party Site, including without limitation any link contained in a Third-Party Site, or any changes or updates to a Third-Party Site. CoinMarketCap is providing these links to you only as a convenience, and the inclusion of any link does not imply endorsement, approval or recommendation by CoinMarketCap of the site or any association with its operators. This article is intended to be used and must be used for informational purposes only. It is important to do your own research and analysis before making any material decisions related to any of the products or services described. This article is not intended as, and shall not be construed as, financial advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are the author’s [company’s] own and do not necessarily reflect those of CoinMarketCap.
Source: coinmarketcap.com
1 Comment
Pingback: Bybit Names Sean Ballard as Head of Derivatives and Institutional Business Amid Continued Institutional Expansion – xpertsstudio